Posts Tagged ‘Robert Shiller’

“Animal Spirits” drive the economy

Sunday, October 3rd, 2010

At last, I completed the book Animal Spirits, which I added to my reading list nearly two months ago. The book, written by Berkeley economist George Akerlof and Yale economist Robert Shiller, is fabulous.

Why, then, did it take so long for me to complete it? It is not because the book is long or difficult. It is neither. In fact, it is a joy to read. I neglected it only because I was busy with a study of off-farm work and migration in China. This work, plus social activities, absorbed nearly all my available time.

As I mentioned before, Akerlof (1940-) shared the 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics with Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz. Robert Shiller (1946-) is an expert in the field of finance who makes frequent appearances on Thought du Jour.

If you read no other book on the current financial crisis, this should be the one. Here is an excerpt, from chapter 11 “Why Are Financial Prices and Corporate Investments So Volatile?”:

No one has ever made rational sense of the wild gyrations in financial prices, such as stock prices. ….

The real value of the U.S. stock market rose over fivefold between 1920 and 1929. It then came all the way back down between 1929 and 1932. The real value of the stock market doubled between 1954 and 1973. Then the market came all the way back down. It then lost half of its real value between 1973 and 1974. The real value of the stock market rose almost eightfold between 1982 and 2000. Then it lost half of its value between 2000 and 2008.

The question is not just how to forecast these events before they occur. The problem is deeper than that. No one can even explain why thee events rationally ought to have happened even after they have happened.

One might think, from the self-assurance that economists often display when extolling the efficiency of the markets, that they have reliable explanations of what has driven aggregate stock markets, which they are just keeping to themselves. [They don’t!]

George Akerlof and Robert Shiller, Animal Spirits: How human psychology drives the economy and why it matters for global capitalism (Princeton University Press, 2009), p. 131.

So, what does account for wild swings in stock prices? “Animal spirits”, according to Akerlof and Shiller. But does this knowledge help us predict stock prices? Sadly, I fear not. But it is important to know what we do not know. Economists need to be more humble and not promise what we cannot deliver.

By the way, what are “animal spirits”, those strange beasts invoked by Akerlof and Shiller? I will discuss them in a future post.

the housing boom and bust

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

The New York Times has an interesting article on the psychological effects of the bust that followed the recent housing boom.

animal spirits

Monday, August 9th, 2010

The latest issue of the Economic Journal reached me today. It interests me for two reasons. First, it contains a symposium (6 articles) on “New Empirical Analysis in the Economics of Education”. Second, it contains a review of a book that reportedly “gives homo economicus a well deserved bashing and points up a number of ways in which macroeconomics might be made more helpful to those of us who want to understand what is going on in the world”.

On balance, this book is right. Much of modern macroeconomics is not very helpful in understanding the behaviour of financial markets and the interaction between the financial sector and the real economy. ….

The chapter on household savings is fascinating, generating numerous examples of behaviour at variance with that of the standard rational economic man. This, of course, explains why governments around the world are so heavily involved in pension provision.

Stephen Nickell, “A book review of Animal Spirits“, Economic Journal, August 2010.

That is Oxford economist Stephen Nickell reviewing a book published by Princeton University Press in 2009 and co-authored by Berkeley economist George Akerlof and Yale economist Robert Shiller.

Akerlof (1940-) shared the 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics with Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz. He is best-known for his article “The market for ‘lemons'”, published by the Quarterly Journal of Economics in 1970.

Robert Shiller (1946-) needs no introduction for readers of Thought du Jour.

I have added this book to my “must read’ list.

forecasting financial crisis

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

Tim Harford, author of “The Armchair Economist”, reflects on why he and others failed to see even as late as three years ago that a financial disaster was brewing. In the process, he profiles two economists who got it right – or nearly right.

[T]he [financial] crisis has provided yet another feather in the cap of the behavioural economist Robert Shiller. Prof Shiller correctly identified the dotcom bubble in the late 1990s and then spotted the housing bubble a few years later. This is impressive and many economists took him seriously on both occasions. But the real puzzle here was not the existence of these two bubbles but the fact that the first burst with minor consequences while the second provoked a financial bloodbath.

The crisis provided just as much vindication for Raghuram Rajan, an eminent but perfectly orthodox Chicago-school economist, who in 2005 pointed to elevated house prices and to perverse incentives for investment fund managers, and warned that risk-management tools might be leading to an increased risk of catastrophe. There was no clever psychology here: Prof Rajan simply looked closely at what the basic incentives were and where they might lead.

Tim Harford, “Confessions of an armchair economist”, Financial Times, 4 August 2010.

employment stimulus

Sunday, August 1st, 2010

Yale University economist Robert Shiller says that the US economy needs more stimulus, but the focus should be on “actually putting people to work” rather than just increasing GDP.

[U]nless we take new measures, we face the prospect of protracted unemployment. In June, the unemployment rate stood at 9.5 percent and the rate of long-term unemployment, defined as joblessness for at least 27 weeks, was 4.4 percent

Robert Shiller on financial innovation

Monday, September 28th, 2009

Many financial reformers would like to simplify investment instruments, arguing that their complexity contributed to the 2008 financial crisis. Yale University economist Robert Shiller believes that such thinking is wrong and feels strongly that consumers would benefit from complex financial products. He argues that, just as there is no need to understand the design of a lap-top computer in order to use it, neither is there any need to understand the design of a financial instrument in order to purchase it. Regulators should therefore focus on achieving trust, since it is lack of trust, not complex products, that causes financial markets to crash.

The advance of civilisation has brought immense new complexity to the devices we use every day … including automatic on-off lighting, communications and data processing devices. People do not need to understand the complexity of these devices, which have been engineered to be simple to operate. ….

[F]inancial products have not advanced as much. We are still mostly investing in plain vanilla products such as shares in corporations or ordinary nominal bonds, products that have not changed fundamentally in centuries.

Why have financial products remained mostly so simple? I believe the problem is trust. People are much more likely to buy some new electronic device such as a laptop than a sophisticated new financial product. ….

Unfortunately, people do not trust some good innovations that could protect them better. [One example is] the innovations in mortgages in recent years (involving such things as option-adjustable rate mortgages) …. I have proposed the idea of