Posts Tagged ‘profile’

profile of Stanley Fischer

Sunday, February 17th, 2013

Greg Mankiw today links to a profile of Stanley Fischer (age 69), with the note “Stan was my PhD dissertation adviser”.

As governor of Israel’s central bank, Fischer is credited with saving Israel from the worst of the 2008 global recession, by devaluing sharply the Israeli Shekel:

If [Federal Reserve Chairman Ben] Bernanke halved the value of the dollar relative to, say, the Chinese yuan, that would dramatically increase U.S. exports and probably economic growth, too, but it would also wreak havoc with the global financial system. Every dollar-denominated asset in the world, including all manner of bonds, would plummet in value.

It’s less risky for small countries. There aren’t massive piles of shekels lying around in other countries the way there are with dollars and euros, and Fischer took advantage of that fact. On May 30, 2008, a dollar was worth about 3.2 shekels. On March 6, 2009, it was worth 4.2 shekels. In less than a year, Fischer had reduced the value of the shekel by about 25 percent — a massive devaluation.

It worked. Exports soared, and 2008’s trade deficit of $2 billion became 2009’s trade surplus of $5 billion. While other countries fell deeper into recession, Israel brushed its shoulders off.

Dylan Matthews, “Stan Fischer saved Israel’s economy. Can he save America’s?“, Wonkblog, 15 February 2013.

Fischer will soon replace Bernanke as head of the US central bank (known as “the Fed”). Many expect great things from Fischer, but at least one of his former students is not impressed:

Fischer was my professor for monetary economics, and his was one of the three signatures on my dissertation. He was a nice man and an impressive teacher, but I did not care for his course, which I thought was just typical MIT mathematical masturbation.

I think that Fischer’s influence on the economics profession was large and detrimental. A ridiculously high proportion of macroeconomics professors are descendants in some way of Fischer. He was their thesis adviser, or their adviser’s adviser, or their adviser’s adviser’s adviser, etc. The net result is a macroeconomics discipline dominated by mathematical technique, with relatively little thought about the real workings of the economy or whether measured national statistics actually correspond to theoretical macroeconomic variables.

Arnold Kling, “Profile of Stanley Fischer“, AskBlog, 17 February 2013.

Fischer’s performance as head of Israel’s central bank does not impress me. A chart that accompanies Mattews’ profile reveals that the fall in growth rates from peak to trough in Israel, following the onset of the 2008 Great Recession,  was precisely the same in Israel as it was in the United States – about 7 percentage points. The difference is that Israel fell from 7% growth, and the US from a more anaemic 2.5% rate of growth. Israel’s recovery has been slower than that of the US, relative to each country’s pre-crisis rates of growth. (See the chart reproduced below.)

Hong Kong wealth

Saturday, January 26th, 2013

David Pilling, FT Asia editor, interviews property tycoon Cecil Chao in his waterfront mansion.

Sharing wealth around is not one of the more noticeable characteristics of Hong Kong, one of the most unequal societies in the developed world. “We have too many poor people. That’s obviously not good for Hong Kong,” he concedes. “We will be unsettled and it will affect security. But too much social welfare is also not good,” he goes on. “It makes people too lazy to work and you get the same situation as you have in Greece, Spain and Portugal.”

David Pilling, “Babe magnate“, Financial Times, House & Home section, 26 January 2013.

The Nordic countries are much better examples of ‘welfare states’ than are Greece, Spain and Portugal. I wonder if Cecil believes that the residents of southern Europe are lazier than those of southern Europe, preferring to live from generous government benefits rather than work.

Cecil Chao Sze-tsung (born 1936) is a Hong Kong billionaire who “claims to have slept with 10,000 women – and to be adding regularly to his tally”. Cecil has fathered three children with three different women, but has never married. “Marriage is difficult”, he explains, “particularly under Hong Kong law. She can take a lot of your money away.”


 

Tyler Cowen profiled by FT

Saturday, December 22nd, 2012

This week’s “Lunch with the FT” features GMU economist Tyler Cowen. The interview is interesting throughout, including this reaction from Cowen to the eurozone crisis.

“Well I think I’ve always been the hopeful one,” he says …. For Cowen, it is vital to separate the euro from Europe. “It’s remarkable what a religion [the euro] can be … This is the symbol of the fact we don’t shoot at each other any more – it’s not! It’s a misguided currency area and you weren’t shooting at each other before you had it.”

John McDermott, “Lunch with the FT: Tyler Cowen“, Financial Times, 22 December 2012.

Happy holidays! I will soon be travelling, visiting friends and family. Don’t look for new posts before 2013.

Martha Stewart at 71

Saturday, November 24th, 2012

Martha Stewart is 71 years old, and continues to work as hard as ever.

[S]he does yoga every day, gets up at 5am to write, be it a column or a foreword to one of her many crafting/cooking/entertaining/gardening books (77 at last count) and, when I ask her if she has considered retiring, looks horrified and says, “What would I do? My mother never retired. She was a teacher, and then babysat until she was in her nineties.”

Stewart (who was born Kostyra) grew up in New Jersey, one of six children, and began her career on Wall Street; she didn’t embark on her adventures in public home-making until the 1970s, when she and her then-husband, publisher Andy Stewart, moved to Connecticut and – having taught herself to cook from Julia Child’s Mastering the Art of French Cooking – she opened a catering business. Things soon expanded, as they have a way of doing around Stewart.

Vanessa Friedman, “Lunch with the FT: Martha Stewart“, Financial Times, 24 November 2012.

If everyone were like Martha Stewart, there would be little  need for retirement saving or old age pensions. Alas, no-one is the equal of Martha Stewart. Not even her  mother. (Can you imagine Martha Stewart employed as a babysitter?)

Tyler Cowen on Canadian TV

Saturday, September 29th, 2012

Steve Paikin produced, for TVO – Government of Ontario TV – a superb, wide-ranging interview of GMU economist Tyler Cowen that anyone can watch, for free, on a home computer. Tyler talks about US politics, the economy, and restaurant food. I give the interview two thumbs up. This is TV worth watching, without commercials, without interruption.

We’ve picked the low-hanging fruit, and that is slowing down our economic growth. Author Tyler Cowen calls it “The Great Stagnation”. He tells Steve Paikin what, if anything, can be done to turn it around.

Tyler Cowen: The Great Stagnation“, The Agenda with Steve Paikin, TVO, 25 September 2012.

The full length is 25 minutes. Kudos to the interviewer, and the interviewee.

Chris Sims on the effects of monetary policy

Thursday, July 19th, 2012

Princeton University economist Christopher Sims explains how he obtained a Nobel Prize.

Gary Tapp: So, if I asked you to describe the main contribution of your work to the field of economic modeling and maybe relating back to the traditional model, how would you describe that?

Chris Sims: I think that what the Noble Prize people were singling out was that my work helped sort out the dispute between the monetarists and Keynesians. They, in part by introducing new approaches to statistical modeling in the ’60s and early ’70s, monetarists were claiming that the main source of business cycle fluctuations was bad monetary policy. The monetary authority was making mistakes, making the growth rate of money vary a lot, and all those variations resulted in recessions and booms, and if only we could force the monetary authority to stop messing with the economy and just keep money growth steady, the business cycle would be greatly reduced or even vanish.

And then the Keynesians were saying that can’t be true, but they didn’t have statistical models in which they could each put forward their position and ask, well, what did the data say? There were lots of attempts to do that, but with very awkward statistical modeling.

Over the course of about 10 years, things that I did and other people followed up on managed to sort out what the effects of monetary policy changes are and distinguish those from co-movements in money and prices and income that didn’t have anything to do with policy. There’s now pretty much a consensus on how monetary policy affects the economy, and on what the size of that effect is. The general conclusion is that it accounts for maybe somewhere between zero and 20 or 25 percent of the fluctuations we see, but if you try to trace out historically, you can’t blame any recession on monetary policy.

Gary Tapp, “An Interview with Chris Sims, 2011 Nobel Laureate“, Classroom Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 2 April 2012.

Christopher Sims (born 1942) was awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in economics jointly with Thomas Sargent. Professor Sims goes on to compare the European and US currency unions, and explains how his grandfather and an uncle – both were professional economists – stimulated his interest in public policy.

HT Mark Thoma.

Wolf at lunch with Krugman

Saturday, May 26th, 2012

[Paul] Krugman, 59, most hated and most admired columnist in the US, rumpled and professorial, is sitting at a small table in the middle of the restaurant, working on his laptop. It is Thursday and he is writing his column. What, I ask, is it on? “It’s going to be Europe,” he replies. “Partly because it is coming to a head, partly because I am a little overstretched and that’s what I’m ready for. So I’m going to do that one.” I understand the feeling of being overstretched: Krugman is writing two columns a week, posting regularly on his blog, writing popular books and teaching.

Martin Wolf, “Lunch with the FT: Paul Krugman“, Financial Times, 26 May 2012.

Ayn Rand and the Tea Party

Thursday, March 1st, 2012

While lecturing others for most of her life on the meaning of morality, [Ayn] Rand had extramarital sex for more than a decade with a younger man who worked for her. His wife was among her inner circle of friends and Rand herself was married. A believer in acquiescence to selfish desires, Rand published a 1964 collection of essays with Nathaniel Branden titled The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism. Adding particular poignancy to the title, Branden was the young subordinate with whom she was sleeping.

Rand, and her supporters, including Alan Greenspan, viewed altruism as evil: altruism is evil, selfishness is good. ….

Ayn Rand built her Objectivist philosophy that permeates today’s Tea Party around individual self interest and eliminating government run social welfare programs, but she herself was on Medicare and Social Security.

Even after the attack at Pearl Harbor, Rand was against the U.S. entering World War II. She viewed government force as evil, but her own followers were regularly purged, shunned and vilified. She was an atheist, as are all true Objectivists, according to the grande dame of radical capitalism. ….

The widest gulf between Rand and her devoted Tea Partiers is on the issue of God. [Gary] Weiss says: “She hated religion, especially Christianity. But faith in God was the essence of life to a great many in the Tea Party. Tea Party literature sometimes read like hymnals, with copious references to the Almighty and Jesus. In his vest-pocket-sized The Tea Party Manifesto, author and conservative commentator Joseph Farah invokes the Deity on almost every one of its tiny pages.”

Pam Martens, “Ayn Rand: the Tea Party’s Miscast Matriarch“, CounterPunch, 27 February 2012.

Ms Martens is reviewing Gary Weiss’ book,  Ayn Rand Nation: The Hidden Struggle for America’s Soul (St. Martin’s Press, 2012). She is a veteran of Wall Street, where she worked for 21 years. blogs at www.WallStreetOnParade.com and is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press, forthcoming, April 2012).

Paul Krugman: the Playboy interview

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012

KRUGMAN: Obama is very much an establishment sort of guy. The whole image of him as a transcendent figure was based on style rather than substance. If you actually looked at what he said, not how he said it, he said very establishment things. …. He was talking about Social Security cuts during the 2008 primary. That’s how you sound serious in our current political culture. He wasn’t sufficiently distanced to step back and say that a lot of our political culture is completely insane.

PLAYBOY: Of the three main political candidates in the 2008 primaries, Hillary Clinton and John Edwards had more progressive plans on health care than Obama.

KRUGMAN: Right. And we might notice that the really big debate, which was furious and screaming, was about whether we needed a mandate on health care reform. And the answer is of course we did. Obama was just wrong and, I have to say, demagoguing a bit during the primary by pretending you wouldn’t need it and by using that as a stick with which to beat Hillary. A lot of people who were normally like me didn’t like me because I was saying, “Obama’s really not the progressive you think he is.” And now they’re all saying, “He’s not the progressive we thought he was.” He came in prepared with the wrong set of instincts, and it’s taken a while to get past that.

Jonathan Tasini, “Interview: Paul Krugman“, Playboy, 16 February 2012.

This lengthy interview is interesting throughout. I assume that Princeton economist Paul Krugman needs no introduction.

Daron Acemoglu on the Arab Spring

Friday, September 30th, 2011

MIT economist Daron Acemoglu has a long interview in the current issue of The Region, a quarterly publication of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve.

This portion of the interview caught my eye. It was in response to the question “I wonder if you could share any thoughts you’ve had about how that research [with James Robinson] applies to the Arab Spring.”

The big question is, Is this going to be a political revolution in the same way as the Glorious Revolution in England, which unleashed a fundamental process of transformation in the political system with associated economic changes? Ultimately, such political revolutions are fundamental to the growth of nations. That’s one of the arguments we make.

Or is it going to be the sort of revolution like the Bolshevik Revolution or the independence movements in much of sub-Saharan Africa in the 1960s, where there was a change in political power, but it went from one group to another, which then re-created the same system and started the same sort of exploitative process as the previous one?

Douglas Clement, Interview with Daron Acemoglu, The Region (Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis), September 2011.

Daron Acemoglu (born 1967) is a Turkish economist of Armenian origin. He is co-author (with James Robinson) of Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 1995) and Why Nations Fail: Origins of Power, Poverty and Prosperity (forthcoming, Crown, 2012).

Acemoglu, though brilliant, is surprisingly humble. Douglas Clement, in the interview, recalls “In 2009, you [Acemoglu] gave a presentation at the International Monetary Fund/World Bank in which you answered the question, What should we do about the financial crisis? with a three-word answer: I don’t know.”